704 W Park Ave Suite C
 Edgewater FL 32132-1409
 Ph 800-832-2823
 Fx 208-631-6381
 Outside the US:

IP Data Corporation


Client Information

IP Data Corp. does not sell, give away, or make any client information public, or available to anyone outside of our organization unless we ask our client's permission first - and then, only for a very good reason (such as safety, security or when required by law).

We feel very strongly about your privacy as well as our own.  We will not add to the millions of pieces of junk email, commonly referred to as SPAM (or UCE - Unsolicited Commercial Email) no matter what profit may come of it. And we will do our best not to aid those that produce junk email. Email can be a very useful business tool, but only if used properly.

We periodically send email to notify owners and subscribers of our government publications series of  important updates, corrections and new editions, as part of our regular service, but ONLY if they have asked for it. This is the only email we send to clients on a regular basis, unless you OPT-IN to a newsletter or other items of this nature that we may offer from time to time. You will never be "opted in" to anything we offer without knowing about it and specifically asking for it. You may subscribe to our Government Publications Newsletter when available, but we will NOT send it to you unless you ask.

Cookies, Web Bugs, Clear Gifs & Your Privacy

Cookies are a few lines of information that web servers place on your computer to track things such as your shopping cart, a valid logon, or other information. A typical cookie of ours looks like this:
APLSSignonName = Bob   SAT, 22-Nov-2003 16:32:11 GMT   IPDataCorp.com/

The first item is the name and value for that item, followed by the expiration date of the cookie, and finally a "path" on the server that issued the cookie. As you can see, it's not "rocket science."  We use cookies only to track your APLS logon, and they are only read by us (the same server that placed them there). We NEVER put passwords, PINs, or private/personal information inside of cookies.

For the most part, cookies are harmless, however, when combined with other technologies or practices such as "Web Bugs" (also known as Clear Gif technology) they can be used to track your "web surfing habits," purchasing patterns, and possibly even to identify you and your email address (and maybe even your physical name and address) along with all the other data they have collected about you. IP Data Corporation does do not approve of this practice, nor do we participate with any of the companies that do this sort of thingWe feel that if someone wants to know where you've been, they need to ask you, and you should also have the right to say "NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS, Thanks..."  Some companies participate and don't even know it. To prevent some of this from happening, you can set the security settings on your browser to "allow cookies to be read only by the site that put them on your computer." This does not interfere with purchases, shopping carts, APLS, or other legitimate uses that we are aware of. Deleting our cookies from your browser will not interfere with any of the services we provide except to log you off of our systems (until you log on again).

Credit Card Purchases

Purchases using a credit card made from us across the Internet are made only on secure servers. We use one of the oldest and most trusted online providers of secure credit card services:  www.QuickCommerce.net. They have been in business since 1989 and transactions are submitted using certain encryption transaction ID methods. Our systems are identified to them with secure technologies and your information is as safe here as it possibly can be.
ALWAYS look for the Yellow Lock symbol Yellow Padlock in the bottom status line of your browser when entering your credit card numbers. Another indicator of a secure connection is when your URL (location) line turns yellow along with the beginning letters "https://" (note the "s" for secure). If you don't see one of these indicators, DO NOT enter your credit card or any personal information!

From our site, you are  taken to https://secure.quickcommerce.net/ for all credit card transactions. If you don't see IPDataCorp.com or secure.quickcommerce.net during all stages of the transaction, then you are possibly NOT doing business with us.  Your purchases with us are confidential and will remain that way. We will never send you email asking for credit card numbers, expiration dates, passwords, or anything else of a personal or financial nature unless you are expecting it (confirmed with a phone call you made to us). If someone calls you from IP Data Corporation, they will never ask you for any such information unless you initiated the call or transaction (e.g., a verified call back).


Same US Patents, Different CPC Classifications.   WHY? 

The USPTO MCF data began in late 2015, and almost immediately we noticed differences between the MCF and DOCDB for the same US patents. The differences were not trivial. 30 days later we started our project to track and analyze these differences. 

We mistakenly assumed that the USPTO sent DOCDB updates to the EPO with CPC classes in them, and the EPO used them.  But as it turns out, US patents are classified by both authorities, and not always in the same Groups and Sub-Groups. A small number were even found to be in totally different sub-classes and a few were not even in the same class  (all of these appeared to be mistakes and were fixed fairly quickly). 

Early results indicated it was a learning curve. The EPO had a decent headstart with the new CPC since it has its roots in ECLA, the EPO's previous system, with both based on the ST.8 standard (with minor differences). For the USPTO, it was a brand new ball game with a different set of rules. Frankly, the thought of training 9000 or so examiners on a new Class system in 12 to 18 months conjureed up images of hearding cats...  while wearing a blindfold. To the USPTO's credit, we began to see far fewer differences in less than 8 or 9 month (summer of 2016).  We are now headed into the winter of 2017, and thankfully, they are growing even closer.  

If you build your own search system, this could be a problem for your searchers. If not, does your current search provider index both sets?

Searching by classification is the most popular method for professional searchers, and depending on the type of search, a good searcher will often "eyeball" EVERY document in the Sub-Groups of interest. This can be hundreds of documents, or even a thousand or two depending on the technology.

The following questions remain:

1)  Whose CPC data is more accurate?

2) They will ever match exactly- No-  so how close will they get?

3) How will this affect your class searches?

4) Is it wise to index both sets of CPC data into one system?  (we think so - just ignore the duplicates!)

5)  CPC data for Reissue patents is still not included in the U.S. MCF. Will it ever be?

We will continue to acquire Reissue CPC data from DOCDB for our subscribers in our standard CSV file format until the USPTO supplies it.